Skip to Main Navigation

Bangladesh - Third Rural Electrification Project (Inglês)

The audit rates the outcome of the project as highly satisfactory, sustainability as highly likely, and institutional development as high. Lessons suggest that attributable to the success of the project was in part, the availability of the master plan, a tried tested model, strengthened by technical assistance from the US National Rural Electrification Cooperative Association. However, even without a sound master plan, the project would not have succeeded in the absence of long-term commitments by the Government. It is important to note the unique division of labor in the Bangladesh system of rural electrification: the cooperatives handle consumer services, and operational aspects; the (apex) Rural Electrification Board performs a quasi-regulatory function, and provides finance, technical inputs, and training; and, the private sector carries out construction. This is a promising model, noteworthy for its transparency, and the quality of performance monitoring. Nonetheless, the feasibility of serving poorer households needs to be more carefully researched, for it is possible that a tradeoff between coverage of the poorest households, and the financial performance of the cooperatives become effective, so, those poorer households - capable of paying domestic electricity tariffs - may nonetheless be cut off from grid supply, because they cannot afford upfront connection costs. This may be the case for providing a targeted subsidy to cover these one-time costs.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2001/06/14

  • TIpo de documento

    Relatório sobre Avaliação do Desempenho do Projeto

  • No. do relatório

    22419

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Bangladesh,

  • Região

    Sul da Ásia,

  • Data de divulgação

    2017/11/20

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Bangladesh - Third Rural Electrification Project

  • Palavras-chave

    Water and Power Development Authority;country and sector assistance strategy;Operational Core Curriculum;public supply of electricity;high rural population density;dialogue on sector reform;marginal cost of supply;total electricity consumption;cost of electricity;poor household;difference in income;Access to Electricity;costs of connection;quality of performance;division of labor;institutional development impact;number of connections;peak demand hour;demand for electricity;amount of land;poverty criterion;rural electrification scheme;country assistance strategy;Country Assistance Strategies;Solar Home System;loss of income;international boundary;quality at entry;management of operation;cost of distribution;collection of arrears;education child;renewable energy source;system of performance;education of child;transmission and distribution;financial viability;power system;rural area;audit mission;grid supply;borrower performance;finance charges;load shedding;bulk purchase;rural electricity;annual consumption;commercial operation;grid extension;house wiring;panel data;consumer service;operational aspect;Electric Power;supervision cost;power line;project costing;distribution line;household consumption;financial reporting;power supplier;commercial connection;domestic electricity;electricity sale;power supply;street light;targeted subsidy;petroleum product;domestic connection;grid expansion;entry qualification;cooperative management;skill base;rural cooperative;electricity supplier;long-term commitment;supply consumer;power company;counterpart funding;donor funding;improved information;program performance;rural consumer;domestic consumer;commercial enterprise;cultivated area;urban consumer;project's achievements;financial analyst;rural life;dollar term;sustainable use;positive impact;average ratings;Cash flow;administrative support;diesel generator;distribution network;cooperative finance;power factor;long-term strategy;surplus fund;Power Market;financial difficulties;buy electricity;Rural Poor;community drive;Job Creation;equity criterion;low-income household;basic necessity;productive use;transition arrangement;loan covenant;Energy Sector;Natural Resources;private contractor;skilled labor;performance incentive;loss reduction;institutional performance;incentive system;energy supplier;economic efficiency;monitoring program;vested interests;females age;physical achievement;poverty impact;tariff increase;independent supplier;bulk power;diesel oil;bulk consumers;retail consumer;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.