The Tajikistan Farm Privatization Support Project has a satisfactory outcome, is likely to be sustainable, and has a modest institutional development impact. The performances of both the Bank and the Borrower are satisfactory. The lessons cited concerned: using a dedicated project management unit; the need for active intervention by Ministers and high level officials to push through changes that were unpopular at the lower echelons of Government; establishing credit facilities even though the legal and regulatory had not yet sufficiently evolved; the demonstration value of the land registration component; and difficulties in adapting former soviet administrative structures to serve private clients at the grass Roots. In regard to the latter, the weakest aspect of the project has been the inability to institutionalize more effectively the delivery of farm information services. That is mostly due to the fact that the current structure of the agricultural ministry is on the one hand under-funded to effectively fulfill its mandate and, not suited for the delivery of farm information to the grassroots. The Government needs to revisit its agricultural policy and the institutional instruments through which it will develop the sector. Its institutions should be reorganized to better be able to serve the emerging private sector, and shift from a command and control structure focusing on production targets to a regulatory and policy body which lays the proper incentives to foster the development of the agricultural sector. Such a structure would concentrate more efforts on its ability to deliver information and guidance to the producer at the grassroots and involve consultation with the private sector in forming policies and guidelines.
Detalhes
-
Data do documento
2006/06/29
-
TIpo de documento
Conclusão da Implementação e Relatórios sobre Resultados
-
No. do relatório
36487
-
Nº do volume
1
-
Total Volume(s)
1
-
País
-
Região
-
Data de divulgação
2006/08/14
-
Disclosure Status
Disclosed
-
Nome do documento
Tajikistan - Farm Privatization Support Project
-
Palavras-chave
Poverty and Social Impact Assessment;land use right;State and Collective Farms;efficient allocation of resource;Work Program and Budget;financial and procurement management;Land Administration and Management;irrigation and drainage;quality at entry;Financial Management System;institutional development impact;Land Registration System;principal performance ratings;cotton growing area;joint stock company;lack of credit;water user association;ratings of bank;lack of accountability;transfer of land;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;public awareness campaign;biological control methods;grass root level;distribution of water;number of shareholders;productivity of land;command and control;pricing irrigation water;concept of land;loan loss provision;land tenure legislation;real estate registry;payment of interest;institutional capacity building;increased agricultural productivity;adult education program;Supply of Water;secure water supply;quality and quantity;cotton seed oil;rehabilitation of infrastructure;agricultural information service;damage to infrastructure;lack of resource;outputs by components;average farm size;high yield wheat;start up capital;reliable water supply;farmer;
- Exibir mais
Downloads
COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO
Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)
- PDF oficial
- TXT*
- Total Downloads** :
- Download Stats
-
*A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.