Skip to Main Navigation

Argentina - Second Phase of the Adaptable Lending Program in Support of the Second and Third Phases of the Social and Fiscal National Identification System (SINTyS) Project (Inglês)

Ratings for the Second Phase of the Adaptable Lending Program in Support of the Second and Third Phases of the Social and Fiscal National Identification System (SINTyS) Project for Argentina were as follows: outcomes were moderately satisfactory, risk to development outcome was moderate, Bank performance was moderately satisfactory, and Borrower performance was satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: early institutionalization of SINTyS helped to ensure the sustainability of project activities. Given the constant evolution in technology, it is critical that technology intensive projects be attentive to changes and how advances can impact business model. While the complexity of projects that are intensive in the procurement of information and communication technology (ICT) products and services can often result in delays, strong coordination between the SINTyS and the Bank team can help ensure the timely completion of planned activities. While project design should include sufficient indicators to monitor progress on key aspects of implementation, too many results indicators can complicate monitoring efforts.


  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Conclusão da Implementação e Relatórios sobre Resultados

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    América Latina e Caribe,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Argentina - Second Phase of the Adaptable Lending Program in Support of the Second and Third Phases of the Social and Fiscal National Identification System (SINTyS) Project

  • Palavras-chave

    Administrative and Civil Service Reform;electronic form;data quality;municipal levels of government;provincial agency;ip disbursements archived;information and communication technology;Tax Policy and Administration;investment in information technology;social security benefit;exchange of information;result indicator;Registry of Deeds;information exchange system;accuracy of information;social program;tax administration system;standard operating procedure;public sector modernization;value added tax;exchange of data;outputs by components;quality of data;collection of information;assessment of outcome;quality at entry;capacity building strategy;assessment of risk;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;areas of work;computer security incident;source of financing;Municipalities;Loan to Turkey;data exchange;data type;mitigation measure;data center;juridical person;fiscal program;procurement process;fiscal information;primary author;legal framework;Tax Evasion;public revenue;project effectiveness;financial requirement;loan proceeds;municipal offices;institutional framework;family relationship;exchange standard;legal person;tax collection;annual meetings;formal procedures;constitutional guarantee;real time;Physical securities;Data Protection;security architecture;intermediate indicator;monthly reports;access right;external control;student population;individual citizen;exchange information;social inclusion;tax burden;public program;monitoring activity;poverty alleviation;data security;organizational structure;financial mechanism;monitoring information;indirect beneficiary;Safeguard Policies;personal information;pension administration;management indicator;direct beneficiaries;annual procurement;early detection;political support;data indicator;skill set;monitoring indicator;project indicator;security control;operations manual;technological advancement;security audit;municipal capacity;political leadership;acquisition process;municipal participation;independent agency;effectiveness condition;legal opinion;high reliability;diagnostic study;municipal government;external partner;Law Reform;national e-government;social indicator;municipal public;disbursement profile;monetary benefit;limited resources;significant challenge;amendment letter;provincial jurisdiction;social engineering;financial issue;auditing practice;agency head;incident response;consumption pattern;security personnel;municipal agencies;efficiency gain;financial impact;front-end fee;government structure;federal structure;project risk;task forces;infrastructure framework;process indicator;provincial legislation;collected information;social information;Budget Management;management weaknesses;management framework;cumulative total;partner institution;redundant data;security policy;separate agreement;beneficiary survey;stakeholder workshop;Quality Enhancement;accurate information;data standard;fiscal data;fiscal impact;procurement expert;tax benefit;fiscal equity;safeguard policy;



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.