Skip to Main Navigation

Egypt - Natural Gas Connections Project : resettlement policy framework (Inglês)

The objectives of this framework correspond to those of the World Bank policy on Involuntary Resettlement, namely: to avoid or minimize involuntary resettlement and land acquisition through design efforts; if involuntary resettlement and land acquisition is unavoidable, to execute resettlement and compensation activities as sustainable development programs, whereby sufficient investment resources are provided to give the displaced persons an opportunity to share in project benefits; and to assist displaced persons in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and standards of living or at least to restore them to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing prior to the beginning of project implementation, whichever is higher. It is not foreseen that any of the activities of the project would result in involuntary resettlement. In fact, and as per the World Bank's Operations Policy 4.12, Involuntary Resettlement shall be avoided by all means. However, since the in-depth plan and detailed activities for the project are being finalized, Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company (EGAS) is proposing herein a resettlement and compensation framework to be applied during project implementation.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2007/11/14

  • TIpo de documento

    Plano de reassentamento

  • No. do relatório

    RP486

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Egito, República Árabe do

  • Região

    Oriente Médio e Norte da África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2007/11/19

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Egypt - Natural Gas Connections Project : resettlement policy framework

  • Palavras-chave

    law;cash compensation;replacement cost;Demographic and Health Survey;Real estate;market value of land;compensation for land;access to employment opportunity;external monitoring and evaluation;Environmental and Social Impact;arable land;real estate property;standard of living;compensation for loss;legal right;loss of right;displacement of people;land acquisition;severity of impact;method of valuation;access to asset;source income;loss of land;source of income;project affected persons;involuntary resettlement;rights to land;cost of transport;loss of asset;irrigation and drainage;access to land;crop and livestock;urban land;arable land use;case of emergency;source of funding;grievance redress mechanism;cases of land;valuation of losses;real estate owner;construction of road;acquisition of land;displacement and resettlement;negative environmental impact;private real estate;types of property;transfer of ownership;social and environmental;Resettlement Policy Framework;loss of crop;payment of compensation;displaced person;legal ownership;physical asset;transfer tax;expropriated property;administrative authority;Occupation;compensation amount;grazing land;private property;competent authority;ownership right;market price;income source;resettlement plan;transitional assistance;agricultural sites;land crop;replacement land;transitional period;Natural Resources;job opportunities;credit facilities;residential housing;land preparation;compensation measures;tangible asset;legislative framework;legislative requirement;resettlement assistance;policy requirement;vulnerable people;ownership transfer;legal provision;maximum period;market rate;job opportunity;asset valuation;income generation;social capital;protected area;construction site;market cost;safeguard policy;building material;Safeguard Policies;resettlement process;Ethnic Minorities;fair compensation;organizational arrangement;permanent employment;communal property;participatory planning;public cemeteries;improved public;housing sites;land owner;income replacement;informal groups;entitlement benefit;prevailing price;compensation policy;personal belonging;infrastructure facility;monetary compensation;commercial leasing;residential land;political sensitivity;Indigenous Peoples;Public Infrastructure;productive potential;transaction cost;crop income;wage earnings;Public Services;monetary term;lost land;squatter settlement;formal employment;informal activity;land quality;subsistence allowance;transition period;asset base;administrative decentralization;public entity;public body;legal entity;legal entities;public budget;systematic procedure;property result;emergency cases;construction work;resettlement strategy;compensation procedure;consultative process;Host Communities;resettlement effect;single parent;judicial interference;Urban Planning;investment operation;legal jurisdiction;public authority;public property;constitutional provision;sale contract;property right;sanitary drainage;project construction;rural planning;legal title;private ownership;judicial decision;competent jurisdiction;fuel oil;safety implication;industrial consumer;monthly payment;compensation framework;legal affairs;marginalized group;physical disability;investment resource;earning opportunity;traditional rights;legal compensation;local market;environmental resource;social issue;holding company;compensation plan;organizational context;socio-economic survey;compensation contract;Environmental Resources;household survey;fraudulent claim;cropping pattern;internal monitoring;resettlement activities;physical work;Administrative law;civil law;legal procedure;administrative affair;commercial properties;income loss;cultural impact;subsistence support;farm land;religious sites;food assistance;vulnerable group;cultural network;resettlement cost;school building;minimum wage;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.