Skip to Main Navigation

The effects of the Indonesian economic crisis on agricultural households: evidence from the national farmers household panel survey (PATANAS) (Inglês)

This report examines the effects of the 1997 Indonesian economic crisis on the socioeconomic status of rural households, and of agricultural households in particular, using the National Farmers Household Panel Survey (PATANAS). The PATANAS survey captures the structure of agricultural production and all sources of income for nearly 1500 rural households in 35 villages from six provinces during the 1994/95 and 1998/99 crop years. This research considers the effects of the crisis on- farm and off-farm incomes, agricultural production, migration, and employment, with a particular emphasis on crisis effects on poor households.

Detalhes

  • Autor

    Gilligan, Daniel O. Jacoby, Hanan Quizon, Jaime

  • Data do documento

    2000/07/31

  • TIpo de documento

    Documento de Trabalho

  • No. do relatório

    34487

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Indonésia,

  • Região

    Leste Asiático e Pacífico,

  • Data de divulgação

    2010/07/01

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    The effects of the Indonesian economic crisis on agricultural households: evidence from the national farmers household panel survey (PATANAS)

  • Palavras-chave

    gross domestic product;regional distribution;Central Bureau of Statistics;constant price;socio-economic status;per capita income;economic crisis;effectiveness of government programs;per capita income growth;high rural population density;real gross domestic product;terms of trade shift;exchange rate depreciation;source income;source of income;share of income;household income;cost of debt;shipment of good;gdp growth rate;market exchange rate;agricultural household;rural area;rural economic activity;household expenditure data;household head age;income due;ownership of land;land tenure arrangements;household living standard;analysis of vulnerability;income and expenditure;per capita consumption;income earning opportunities;effect of size;loans to business;sale of livestock;food crop production;increase in labor;labor force survey;rural labor force;female labor force;annual inflation rate;world market price;higher interest rate;Oil & Gas;Oil and Gas;macroeconomic policy instrument;adverse income shocks;household labor supply;cost of production;producer price index;agricultural wage earners;per capita expenditure;female labor supply;labor market participation;income from wages;urban labor market;demand for meat;increase in prices;rural wage rate;poor household;farm size;average change;agricultural production;landless household;rice yield;agricultural labor;household survey;household characteristic;Land Ownership;Exchange Rates;consumption expenditure;macroeconomic indicator;Outer Islands;labor contract;credit crunch;cropping pattern;land fertility;industrial production;input use;individual household;crop income;fertilizer use;household interview;food price;rice farmer;estate crop;credit market;socioeconomic status;regression results;crop year;household size;cropping intensity;industrial center;real wage;income change;high wage;socio-economic survey;farm income;adverse shock;negative effect;welfare level;income gain;survey instrument;currency crisis;baseline survey;world price;real income;smaller share;positive shock;female head;macroeconomic shock;summary statistic;safe haven;collected information;rural migration;labor relation;consumption basket;constant term;rural price;fertility index;household data;female headship;domestic demand;income earner;population pressure;land area;old people;price change;employment opportunities;bottom quintile;employment opportunity;small holding;negative shock;vulnerable group;crop output;farm area;household wealth;livestock ownership;labor share;lending behavior;price series;consumer price;village levels;illicit activity;policy purposes;socio-economic indicator;off-farm income;job security;welfare analysis;observed change;agricultural commodity;term vulnerability;vulnerable household;affected households;data gathering;agricultural worker;subsistence requirement;labor arrangement;household asset;statistical correlation;banking sector;national income;thai baht;coping strategy;short-term loan;industrial activity;negative growth;loan default;financial service;labor demand;beneficial change;seed variety;seed varieties;social unrest;imported inputs;rural farmer;drought effect;net effect;indonesian rupiah;livestock output;rural consumer;domestic price;rising unemployment;methodological issue;farming household;tree crop;business income;labor earning;high transport;price deflator;rice price;government transfer;industrial sector;village survey;agricultural input;fertilizer price;crop producers;urban unemployment;national unemployment;political events;capital flight;banking crisis;discount rate;political crisis;political uncertainty;downward spiral;affected farm;national account;wage changes;crop choice;household strategy;capital back;unemployment rate;wage laborer;survey design;increased demand;agricultural output;primary focus;local source;central tendency;regular monitoring;income data;business ownership;political situation;rural village;primary income;farm production;census household;land rental

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.