Skip to Main Navigation

Tanzania - Privatization impact assessment : infrastructure (Inglês)

This report is the output of a technical assistance and dialogue mission financed by the Private Participation in Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF) at the request of the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania. The primary objective of the mission and the report is to support the review of infrastructure privatization in Tanzania. This program was highly ambitious. Despite the fact that it followed the international drive towards privatization at the time, it was unprecedented in the Tanzanian context. All the same, the degree of consensus around the concept of privatization in Tanzania was and is remarkable, and testifies to the degree of dilapidation in the State Owned Enterprises (SOE) sector prior to privatization. There was a scarcity of goods in many sectors-beer being perhaps the most startling example-and a generally very low level of services in many key sectors, particularly in infrastructure-meaning the public service commodities; i.e., electricity, water, telecommunications and transport. The program has been a solid success. It has made a significant contribution to Tanzania's strong macroeconomic performance in the last decade, partly by severely limiting the flow of subsidies to loss making enterprises, and in their place obtaining tax revenues from privatized ones.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2011/06/01

  • TIpo de documento

    Esquema da Infraestrutura do País

  • No. do relatório

    68869

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Tanzânia,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2012/05/24

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Tanzania - Privatization impact assessment : infrastructure

  • Palavras-chave

    Privatization;Quality and Cost Based Selection;tax administration as major obstacle;infrastructure privatization;privatization transaction;private operator;private participation in infrastructure;implementation of privatization transactions;Micro and Small Enterprises;legal and regulatory framework;cost of finance;infrastructure enterprises;private sector involvement;access to finance;asset holding company;process of privatization;energy sector policy;privatization program;development partner;performance of organizations;case of failure;preparation for privatization;success and failure;effect of conditionality;financing of investment;ownership of infrastructure;effect of privatization;lack of communication;impact of privatization;number of investors;container terminal concession;power and water;national water sector;enterprise before privatization;long term development;state owned enterprise;concept of privatization;broad consultative process;gdp growth rate;privatization of infrastructure;investment climate assessment;skills and education;urban water utility;infrastructure privatization program;terms of competition;production due;price and quality;local private operators;source of financing;corporate tax rate;transaction process;privatization process;contractual relationship;lease contract;procurement process;public debate;procurement procedure;post privatization;efficient management;regulatory capacity;parastatal enterprise;air transport;partial divestiture;open debate;Success Fee;limited competition;international call;legal advice;public money;infrastructure asset;national privatization;private management;standard procurement;financial datum;infrastructure sector;asset stripping;broad ownership;multimodal transport;contract monitoring;privatization strategy;commercial legislation;poverty alleviation;fixed line;operational performance;acute crisis;individual enterprise;state policy;donor effort;connection rate;infrastructure service;policy stance;donor financing;equity option;investment capital;policy formulation;regulatory issue;mobile service;productive enterprise;Learning and Innovation Credit;ample evidence;psychological issues;air traffic;donor investment;standard approach;formal bids;management contractor;external investor;stakeholder participation;fixed payment;audit result;discount factor;negotiation procedures;public operator;city water;rural area;technology revolution;power system;mobile network;budget support;power utilities;mobile communication;power utility;electricity law;Financing plans;fiscal contribution;competitive position;black hole;railway company;Regulatory Bodies;financial system;railway corporation;negotiating capacity;legal capacity;legal skill;risk appetite;government administrative;enabling legislation;regulatory body;survey results;safety regulation;productive sector;privatization policy;civil society;access right;general population;telecommunications network;private investor;Socialist countries;international investor;donor agencies;home countries;home country;potential investor;existing contract;labor issue;customs regulation;vat rate;Tax Evasion;power outage;efficient investment;comparator country;loan period;private involvement;telecommunication service;privatization conditionality;privatization agency;labor relation;infrastructure policy;legal adviser;prospective partner;passenger seat;passenger traffic;affordable service;enterprise survey;macroeconomic instability;trade regulation;business environment;Public-Private Partnership;tax revenue;competitive sector;distinct phase;transparent manner;private provider;direct credit;export company;macroeconomic performance;severely limits;negative image;performance assessment;term of privatization;telecommunications company;successful privatization;commercial sector;airline sector;infrastructure area;expatriate managers;utility operation;labor dispute;financial commitment;national interest;extensive use;political sensitivity;retrenchment payment

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.