Skip to Main Navigation

Georgia - Municipal Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project: First Municipal Development and Decentralization Project; Second Municipal Development and Decentralization Project (Inglês)

Ratings for the Municipal Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project for Georgia were as follows: outcome was moderately unsatisfactory; risk to the development outcome was low; Bank performance was moderately unsatisfactory; and Borrower performance was moderately unsatisfactory. Ratings for the First Municipal Development and Decentralization Project were as follows: outcome was moderately satisfactory; risk to the development outcome was low; Bank performance was moderately satisfactory; and Borrower performance was also moderately satisfactory. Ratings for the Second Municipal Development and Decentralization Project were as follows: outcome was satisfactory; risk to the development outcome was low; Bank performance was satisfactory; and Borrower performance was also satisfactory. Some lessons learned included from the project: in providing assistance for the reform of any sector municipal in this case-Bank and Borrower need also to help ensure that information systems are adequate for implementing the reforms and for monitoring progress. In the case of these three projects, information on municipal finances and on the economic performance of sub-project investments was sparse. Georgia's situation in this regard could be improved by the greater use of municipal experiences of other countries. Political volatility provides unusual challenges and opportunities for Bank supervision. It calls for more thorough documentation than normal, detailing all actions agreed between Bank and Borrower. It also requires greater oversight of project financial management. In the case of Georgia, it did provide opportunities for the Bank to act as valued and stable interlocutor in times of change. Major political and economic transition, while offering opportunities for reform, may slow down progress with municipal reform in particular, as national governments work to establish the effectiveness of their central control. When municipal management is very weak overall, it makes sense to work first with stronger and creditworthy municipalities that are most likely to succeed. In Georgia, the national government could recognize and foster these municipalities as models of good practice and sources for inspiration and technical assistance for others to learn from.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2008/06/23

  • TIpo de documento

    Relatório sobre Avaliação do Desempenho do Projeto

  • No. do relatório

    44310

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Geórgia,

  • Região

    Europa e Ásia Central,

  • Data de divulgação

    2008/07/29

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Georgia - Municipal Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project: First Municipal Development and Decentralization Project; Second Municipal Development and Decentralization Project

  • Palavras-chave

    borrower need;Accounting and Information System;infrastructure and service delivery;water supply and sewerage;Municipalities;quality at entry;water and sewerage;financial reporting system;local government entity;survival and health;gnp per capita;Local Economic Development;weak financial management;delivery of water;supply consumer;level of performance;municipal financial management;water supply service;staff appraisal reports;donor agency staff;water supply investment;infrastructure and services;municipal reform;Municipal Finance;municipal management;urban service;borrower performance;creditworthy municipality;cold weather;utility service;municipal official;municipal budget;municipal participation;Government Performance;stated objective;field visits;heating system;decentralization policy;local investment;financial autonomy;procurement management;cost-benefit analysis;government credibility;sewerage system;raw sewage;Urban Infrastructure;governing body;administrative support;project's impact;distribution network;financial information;financial datum;natural disaster;selection criterion;credit operation;procedural requirement;poor infrastructure;water production;public awareness;decentralization reform;school building;financial targets;employment opportunities;employment opportunity;municipal affair;municipal department;computer equipment;counterpart fund;cultural facilities;foreign bidder;institutional strengthening;land border;commercial traffic;Residential Neighborhood;cleaner air;road improvement;sewage treatment;city mayor;apparent decline;sectoral approach;counterpart funding;municipal lending;credit effectiveness;project ratings;tax collection;bank assistance;educational program;audited account;dust particle;equity criterion;municipal administration;heat service;independent nation;south ossetia;minimizing risk;state law;National Institutions;eligibility criterion;central control;standard procurement;financial oversight;political volatility;small country;municipal experience;government units;local self government;monitoring progress;rural area;financial intermediaries;centralized state;management capacity;good information;large town;municipal creditworthiness;city government;resource mobilization;legal opinion;baseline survey;municipal involvement;municipal government;sewage system;trading partner;internal displacement;Civil War;environmental condition;health standards;financing arrangement;urban population;financial responsibility;political pressure;small cities;volatile country;municipal sector;market economy;local management;power supply;wastewater treatment;labor mobility;panel review;municipal performance;european charter;field work;input indicator;measurable performance;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.