Skip to Main Navigation

Impact evaluation in practice (Inglês)

Development programs and policies are typically designed to change outcomes such as raising incomes, improving learning, or reducing illness. Whether or not these changes are actually achieved is a crucial public policy question, but one that is not often examined. Impact evaluations are part of a broader agenda of evidence-based policy making. This growing global trend is marked by a shift in focus from inputs to outcomes and results, and is reshaping public policy.The first part of the book presents an overview of impact evaluation. Chapter 1 discusses why impact evaluation is important and how it fits within the context of ethical, evidence-based policy making. The authors contrast impact evaluation with monitoring, introduce the defining features of impact evaluation, and discuss complementary approaches, including cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. The authors introduce a core focus of the book: namely, how a program’s available resources, eligibility criteria for selecting beneficiaries, and timing for mplementation serve to structure options in the selection of impact evaluation methods. Finally, the authors introduce different modalities of impact evaluation, such as prospective and retrospective evaluation, and efficacy versus effectiveness trials and conclude with a discussion on when to use impact evaluations. Chapter 2 discusses how to formulate evaluation questions and hypotheses that are useful for policy. These questions and hypotheses determine the focus of the evaluation. The authors also introduce the fundamental concept of a theory of change and the related use of results chains and performance indicators. Chapter 2 provides the first introduction to the fictional case study, the Health Insurance Subsidy Program (HISP), that is used throughout the book and in the accompanying material found on the Impact Evaluation in Practice website (www.worldbank .org/ieinpractice).

Detalhes

  • Autor

    Gertler,Paul J., Martinez,Sebastian, Premand,Patrick, Rawlings,Laura B., Vermeersch,Christel M. J.

  • Data do documento

    2016/09/13

  • TIpo de documento

    Publicação

  • No. do relatório

    108270

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Mundo,

  • Região

    Regiões Mundiais,

  • Data de divulgação

    2016/09/16

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Impact evaluation in practice

  • Palavras-chave

    access to labor market;access to health care;access to safe water;theory of change;Early Childhood Development;conditional cash transfer;impact evaluation methodology;impact on child;average treatment effect;social protection system;privileges and immunity;impact of development;impact evaluation design;early childhood stimulation;years of schooling;school enrollment rate;investment in children;social assistance program;investment fund;world health organization;evidence-based policy;detectable effect;causal effect;public policy;qualitative data;evaluation question;quantitative data;instrumental variable;eligibility criterion;teaching material;program operations;Social Sciences;poor household;institutional review;public program;development policy;small farm;human capital;budget allocation;program impact;operational rules;raising income;preschool program;political sustainability;program performance;social program;test score;global trend;objective assessment;treatment group;technical expert;administrative datum;evaluation study;older sibling;cost-effectiveness analysis;disability day;income support;causal relationship;building knowledge;civil society;credible evidence;intrinsic value;operational implementation;private provider;primary care;motor development;academic achievement;secondary data;primary data;continuous process;rural community;health program;political dialogue;physical development;young child;evaluation result;age range;preschool model;attending school;research assistance;youth employment;research focus;research initiative;academic appointment;infrastructure sector;urban development;sole responsibility;copyright owner;ethical consideration;research ethic;outcome indicator;human subjects;development operation;evaluation technique;evaluation activity;instructional material;research method;natural science;communication strategy;empirical research;Political Economy;policy question;development partner;road map;operational work;external evaluator;allocation rule;general equilibrium;water privatization;Infant Mortality;Child Health;negative spillover;operational tool;Education Policy;Early Education;promotional campaign;effective approach;developmental delays;commercial purpose;survey data;ethnographic study;partnership program;Basic Education;health systems;Learning and Innovation Credit;original work;job placement;long-term effect;positive externality;academic community;cognitive development;cluster approach;knowledge gap;youth training;employment program;cognitive skill;non-governmental organization;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.