Skip to Main Navigation

Land policy dialogues : addressing urban-rural synergies in World Bank facilitated dialogues in the last decade (Inglês)

Land policy, administration and management are areas of strong client demand for technical advice and operational support. This review sought to help the Bank better position itself to present coherent advice on policy, institutional arrangements and practice. The potential implications are a lowering of reputational risk to the Bank; greater efficiency in the process including joint data gathering; and building of greater momentum and ownership of national land policy dialogues. The review found that dialogues are not as divergent as initially thought. Positions that are central to the Bank's message on tenure security, land market efficiencies, administrative integration, proactive and economically efficient land use management and encouragement of rental markets, all receive consonant reflection from the prescriptive policy advice generated by the Bank. The review notes that especially in democratic environments, policy prescriptions are to be judged in the dynamics of political economy and that land is one component where the bargaining becomes most contested. Finally the review suggests the need to go beyond the desk review that was possible in this undertaking and to use more extensive consultations with task team leaders and sector managers to convert the background paper produced under the current exercise into a position paper with a wider audience.


  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Outro estudo sobre infraestrutura

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    Regiões Mundiais,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Land policy dialogues : addressing urban-rural synergies in World Bank facilitated dialogues in the last decade

  • Palavras-chave

    land policies;land policy;land use planning;urban land policy;compensation for expropriated property;Land Administration and Management;impact of land use;Urban and Rural Development;process of land conversion;food security issue;agricultural land;Political Economy;public land management;land acquisition;rural land policy;access to land;land acquisition act;land use practice;national land policy;urban land management;national food security;urban expansion;land management policy;fact finding mission;agriculturally productive land;land administration system;law and regulation;land management system;land use conversion;rates of urbanization;food and agricultural;transfer of land;land use management;loss of right;political economy dimension;urban informal settlements;land tenure reform;urban land use;infrastructure and facilities;rural land titling;national development objective;land use regulation;price of land;land allocation decisions;rural urban fringe;compensation for land;efficient land use;conflict resolution strategy;acquisition of land;communal tenure system;small land holding;rural vulnerability;demand for land;Land Registration System;implications for policy;development of infrastructure;urban food security;absence of coordination;urban land tenure;land use change;food security goals;land information system;lack of integration;revenue from land;land use choice;lack of responsibility;land market;zoning regulation;urban growth;rural context;land right;rapid urbanization;urban development;private land;policy prescriptions;tenure security;property right;small island;Land Ownership;land supply;urban perspective;direct negotiation;targeted outcomes;political will;land sale;coastal region;state land;land records;rental market;potential buyers;land issue;urban sector;rural bank;institutional framework;policy option;Natural Resources;fair compensation;productive use;land development;policy priority;arable land;land problem;land transaction;gradual approach;institutional review;court order;agricultural production;land conflicts;policy scenario;political commitment;opportunity cost;agricultural activity;land classification;governmental institutions;state council;regulatory environment;field visits;land claim;private owner;accessible location;fertile land;business interest;marketable surplus;business permit;landless farmer;farm land;consultation process;political feasibility;family labor;administrative boundary;transparent process;institutional measure;maximum benefit;government institution;boundary dispute;land dispute;market force;supply side;development pattern;administrative aspects;historical data;public policy;informal justice;local development;statutory law;customary law;islamic law;process reengineering;primary market;compensation practice;small farmer;land asset;social stability;future prospect;participatory approach;mixed use;property value;empirical evidence;political interest;asymmetrical information;land reform;policy position;bureaucratic behavior;Agrarian Reform;state ownership;policy perspective;administrative integration;social exclusion;data gathering;reputational risk;potential implication;inverse relationship;democratic environment;rural fringe;grant award;development operation;extensive study;population data;satellite image;urban population;agricultural productivity;regulatory constraint;urban market;institutional memory;housing finance;underserved people;bank assistance;shelter issues;open market;extensive consultation;private property;adequate supply;investor purchase;sustainable environment;land utilization;security form;portfolio review;agricultural purpose;special interest;land shortage;private landowner;coastal area;adjustment process;fish stock;government planning;rural line;coastal provinces;rural policy;asset distribution;food delivery;social upheaval;food distribution;increased demand;promoting equity;representative sample;food market;transport cost;land distribution;Rural Sector;informal development



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.