Econometric Analysis of Framework Agreements in Brazil and Colombia (Inglês)

Inglês

1W-Framework Agreements for Development Impact: Lessons from select countries for global adoption -- P173392

FY17 - Public Administration

FY17 - Public Finance Management,FY17 - Public Expenditure Management,FY17 - MSME Development,FY17 - Enterprise Development,FY17 - Transparency, Accountability and Good Governance,FY17 - Public Administration,FY17 - E-Government, incl. e-services

FY17 - Sub-National Government,FY17 - Central Government (Central Agencies)

TF0B2213-Global Study on use of Framework Agreements,TF0B2440-Framework Agreements for Development Impact

Coronavirus (COVID-19),International Procurement,Open Data Policy,Pooled Procurement,e-Government Procurement,

Governabilidade, Saúde, Nutrição e População, Tecnologias da Informação e Comunicação, Direito e Desenvolvimento, Desenvolvimento do setor público, Desenvolvimento social,

ICT Legal and Regulatory Framework, ICT Policy and Strategies, Judicial System Reform, Legal Products, Legal Reform, Legislation, Pharmaceuticals & Pharmacoeconomics, Public Finance Decentralization and Poverty Reduction, Public Sector Economics, Regulatory Regimes, Social Policy,

EFI-SAR-GOV-Procurement; EFI-SAR-GOV-Procurement (ESARU)

Final

Procurement of commonly used items is a challenge for government agencies. If the items are repeatedly purchased in one-off fashion; so that the total volume is significant; there may be potential problems like loss of economy of scale; loss of efficiency; lower competition; and no long-term partnership with suppliers. Framework agreements (FAs) have emerged as a potential solution for the issues. Many countries (particularly in Americas and Europe) have used FAs successfully; though the use of FAs by count;

Advisory Services & Analytics