Skip to Main Navigation

Uganda - Northern Uganda Reconstruction Project (Inglês)

The audit downgrades the project rating to marginally satisfactory, in light of higher than expected project expenditures, which undermined the efficiency, and achievement of objectives, such as the restoration of economic productivity, poverty reduction, and gender issues. Although the audit agrees with the Implementation Completion Report (ICR) ratings of uncertain sustainability, and modest institutional development impact, the Bank performance is downgraded to unsatisfactory, in light of inadequate responsiveness to the ongoing conflict in the North, project design weakness regarding control, and accountability, and, negligible supervision, further damaging accountability. Lessons drawn from the project emphasize that the Bank's comparative advantage, is not in dealing with ongoing conflict, for this seemingly conventional investment project, should not have intervened with conflict situations, which endangered the lives of staff, and workers, damaged supervision, and failed to see education as a measure of conflict mitigation, that could have raised the opportunity costs of students joining the rebel movement. But the strongest lesson lies in the failure to understand that implementing a project, which entails the introduction of equipment, infrastructure and people, under the circumstances, is a prescription for rebels to target. Project design should have involved district administrations, local communities, and final beneficiaries in project planning.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2000/06/27

  • TIpo de documento

    Relatório sobre Avaliação do Desempenho do Projeto

  • No. do relatório

    20664

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Uganda,

  • Região

    África,

  • Data de divulgação

    2017/11/20

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Uganda - Northern Uganda Reconstruction Project

  • Palavras-chave

    Monitoring and Evaluation Unit;audit mission;project design and implementation;water supply and sanitation;responsibility for service provision;municipal capacity building;financial management and control;lack of security;primary school classroom;living in poverty;local government capacity;national highway network;Poverty & Inequality;institutional development impact;water treatment plant;primary school cost;single parent family;share of benefit;allocation of expenditure;target poverty reduction;abduction of child;central government department;demobilization and reintegration;lack of transparency;quality of outputs;education and health;cost of construction;windows and door;single parent household;allegations of corruption;fight against corruption;lack of control;human rights watch;community-action program;gnp per capita;sewerage treatment plant;reconstruction and rehabilitation;repatriation of capital;ongoing conflicts;defense expenditure;comparative advantage;regional capital;physical implementation;construction cost;sector specialist;field visits;project costing;market town;district officials;appraisal mission;school furniture;regional economy;military expenditure;gender aspect;local development;positive impact;conflict situation;counterpart funding;urban economy;rebel movement;rural area;private investment;international community;fight corruption;opportunity cost;spot check;urban street;borrower performance;net capital;security situation;field review;furniture repair;local economy;public confidence;cross-border trade;audit focus;classroom rehabilitation;rent seeking;main road;rebel attack;construction site;school official;cost data;Centralized Procurement;Conflict Resolution;community ownership;professional experience;expert opinion;audit result;military conflict;war zone;conflict management;volatile region;social aspect;potential demand;local market;urban development;local woman;literacy class;highway access;urban market;urban poor;management structure;physical infrastructure;missing item;extraordinary circumstances;local beneficiary;Justice Systems;stakeholder participation;clear definition;performance rating;debt relief;administrative support;national network;political parties;political party;official correspondence;military spending;donor interest;local resident;armed rebellion;surface condition;air connection;moral responsibility;common sense;small-scale infrastructure;adult woman;principal component;water pump;downtown area;drainage work;financial control;frequent interruption;security check;road transport;economic recovery;gravel surface;maintenance equipment;daily traffic;poor road;Postconflict Reconstruction;conditions of payment;construction quality;unannounced visit;field trip;corrupt official;know how;single-parent family;community structure;stable society;security expert;conflict mitigation;Residential Neighborhood;technical department;mango tree;institutional approach;local costs;exchange rate;Exchange Rates;standard procedure;remote region;district authority;international media;international dimension;Macroeconomic Management;national policy;logistical support;corrective action;economic model;peace accord;home village;Peace Talks;project failure;operational staff;annual expenditure;random survey;expense category;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.