Skip to Main Navigation

Latvia - Liepaja Region Solid Waste Management Project (Inglês)

Ratings for the Liepaja Region Solid Waste Management Project for Latvia were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, the risk to development outcome was high, the Bank performance was highly satisfactory, and the Borrower performance was highly satisfactory. Some lessons learned included: the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) should be integrated into the management structure of the project rather than operate as a separate unit. In this way its competence will be retained within the project and not lost at the end of contract period. The Business Plan for the company, drawn up by foreign consultants, proved to be: too complicated for management. Establishment of such long-term company strategies will make sense only for already well-established entities and not for start-up companies as Liepajas Ras Ltd (L-RAS). The same comment applies to the technical assistance on the financial models developed by a swedish consultant. European Union (EU) accession and related harmonization of local legislation with the EU acquis required additional efforts of cooperation of all parties involved in project implementation, monitoring and supervision to establish univocal understanding of law changes which may impact on achievement of project outputs. The language barrier was often a problem in getting ideas across; the project should have included an intensive english language course for key members of management.

Detalhes

  • Data do documento

    2007/12/21

  • TIpo de documento

    Conclusão da Implementação e Relatórios sobre Resultados

  • No. do relatório

    ICR504

  • Nº do volume

    1

  • Total Volume(s)

    1

  • País

    Letônia,

  • Região

    Europa e Ásia Central,

  • Data de divulgação

    2008/04/30

  • Disclosure Status

    Disclosed

  • Nome do documento

    Latvia - Liepaja Region Solid Waste Management Project

  • Palavras-chave

    dump site;Waste Management;Solid Waste Management;energy cell;Administrative and Civil Service Reform;financial internal rate of return;Electricity;ground water quality;environmental benefit;waste disposal site;environmental clean-up;diversification of energy source;solid waste disposal site;solid waste management company;solid waste management system;local environmental management capacity;sanitary landfill;greenhouse gas emission;regional waste management system;utilization of landfill gas;waste water treatment plant;national environmental policy plan;base case;contamination of groundwater;waste collection points;Cash flow;deposit fee;electricity sale;cash flow projection;local government capacity;quality at entry;land and water;production of electricity;price for electricity;ground water monitoring;local groundwater resource;private sector company;international environmental;reduction of pollutant;qualified audit opinion;procurement and disbursement;Financial Management System;quality of supervision;local waste management;limited liability company;greenhouse gas abatement;sanitary landfill standard;pollution of soil;waste management facilities;Exchange Rates;power purchase agreement;quantity of waste;outputs by components;international emission trading;financial management rating;municipal waste management;disposal on land;wages and salary;number of seminars;profit and loss;amount of electricity;revenues from sale;carbon emission reduction;quality of information;amount of gas;waste management service;waste collection system;amount of emissions;generation of electricity;

Downloads

COMPLETAR RELATÓRIO

Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.