Skip to Main Navigation

Documents & Reports

Showing 1 - 20 of 41 results | Display results in sets of 10 | 20 | 50

Download:
No Records Found. Change your search criteria and try again. I cannot find the document I am looking for.

  • Supporting Judicial Reforms in Armenia : A Forward Look - Public Expenditure and Performance Review of the Judiciary in Armenia (English)

    Armenia’s current political context is defined by ambitious goals. Strengthening democratic institutions and the rule of law, eliminating widespread corruption, and bolstering substantial and inclusive...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: 183353 Document Date: June 27, 2023 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Melis,Eva Maria,Harutyunyan,Nane,Svircev,Srdjan,Shcherbyna,Iryna,Kim,Sidet,Azaryan,Arpine,Boskovic, Marina Matic,Krnic Kulusic,Ana,Dillinger,William R.,Rovan,Lidia,Kitai,Hikaru,Palacio Jaramillo,Ana Maria,Tamamyan,Gayane,Ter-Vardanyan, Haykanoush





  • Serbia Judicial Functional Review Report 2021 - Executive Summary (English)

    The 2021 Serbia Judicial functional review measures progress against the 2014 Judicial functional review baseline and the 2019 Functional review of the prosecution system. The aim of the 2021 Serbia Judicial...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: AUS0002939 Document Date: June 1, 2022 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Svircev,Srdjan,Skopljak,Zoran,Kelly,Ellen M.,Boskovic, Marina Matic,Harrison, Kate

  • Serbia Judicial Functional Review Report 2021 - Key Findings and Recommendations (English)

    The 2021 Serbia Judicial functional review measures progress against the 2014 Judicial functional review baseline and the 2019 Functional review of the prosecution system. The aim of the 2021 Serbia Judicial...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: AUS0002939 Document Date: June 1, 2022 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Svircev,Srdjan,Skopljak,Zoran,Kelly,Ellen M.,Boskovic, Marina Matic,Harrison, Kate

  • Serbia Judicial Functional Review Report 2021 (English)

    The 2021 Serbia Judicial functional review measures progress against the 2014 Judicial functional review baseline and the 2019 Functional review of the prosecution system. The aim of the 2021 Serbia Judicial...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: AUS0002939 Document Date: June 1, 2022 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Svircev,Srdjan,Skopljak,Zoran,Kelly,Ellen M.,Boskovic, Marina Matic,Harrison, Kate





  • Small Claims : Where does Serbia Stand? A Comparative Analysis (English)

    Evidence suggests that poor court performance negatively affects the economy. Complaints about the business climate are often associated with complicated procedural laws and backlogs that beleaguer the...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: 151340 Document Date: May 1, 2020 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Svircev,Srdjan,Senderayi,Runyararo Gladys,Petkova,Svetozara


  • Result Oriented Review of Delivery of Justice in Montenegro (Montenegrin)

    This functional review presents a comprehensive, results-oriented assessment of the functioning of Montenegro’s judicial system from 2014 through 2017, and the country’s compliance with the requirements...

    Document Type: Working Paper Report No.: 139654 Document Date: March 2, 2020 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Svircev,Srdjan,Kelly,Ellen M.,Matic,Marina


  • Getting the Most Out of Serbia’s Central Administration for Improved Public Sector Management (English)

    This synthesis report is based on four reports covering the organization of the center of government, core and non-core functions, misplaced functions, and missing functions related to EU accession. The...

    Document Type: Report Report No.: 145494 Document Date: January 25, 2020 Disclosure Status: Disclosed Author: Muhula,Raymond,Svircev,Srdjan,La Ferrara,Gianni,Rabrenovic, Alexandra,Panovski,Aleksandar,Vlajkovic, Vladmir,Petkovic,Maja,Beslagic,Amir,Zaric,Andrijana,Maniokas,Klaudijus,Percy,Christian William St. John,Djukovic,Svetlana,Mihic,Marko,Markovic,Milos,Rikanovic,Sasa,Obradovic,Vladimir,Evans,Gordon John