Skip to Main Navigation

Argentina - Buenos Aires Urban Transport (PTUBA) Project : Additional financing (Inglês)

This Project Paper seeks the approval of the Executive Directors to provide an Additional Financing to the Argentine Republic to be used for the Buenos Aires Urban Transport Project. The proposed additional loan would finance the costs associated with: (i) covering a financing gap derived from the reallocation of loan resources to respond to Argentina's social emergency in 2002, and to cover unanticipated higher costs for civil works; (ii) financing implementation of modified project activities as part of a partial project restructuring; and (iii) financing the implementation of additional activities to scale up the project's impact and development effectiveness. In addition to the current project's objectives, a fifth development objective has been included: to help in the development of integrated urban transport strategies in Argentina's largest Metropolitan areas, in order to expand the development impact of the project to other cities in Argentina.


  • Data do documento


  • TIpo de documento

    Documento do projeto

  • No. do relatório


  • Nº do volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • País


  • Região

    América Latina e Caribe,

  • Data de divulgação


  • Disclosure Status


  • Nome do documento

    Argentina - Buenos Aires Urban Transport (PTUBA) Project : Additional financing

  • Palavras-chave

    Social and Environmental Assessment;transport policy and planning;environmental and social management;Environmental and Social Impact;Economic Rate of Retum;suburban rail service;urban transport sector;Urban Transport Planning;public transport service;urban public transport;quality of public;public transport efficiency;urban transport system;urban transport management;impact of recession;health and nutrition;private sector operator;internal control system;flow of fund;bus transport system;environmental management system;household transport survey;negative environmental impact;vehicle operating cost;Environmental Management Plan;rail traffic base;number of passengers;environmental management capacity;sustainable urban transport;traffic and pedestrian;average load factor;high crime rate;Urban Transport Policy;environmentally sustainable transport;air pollution monitoring;road safety action;large metropolitan areas;public sector activity;competitiveness of city;urban transport service;price of labor;access to school;civil works;suburban railway;Traffic Safety;social emergency;project execution;positive impact;municipal government;train speed;economic crisis;financial statement;traffic disruption;provincial city;personal security;street vendor;sensitivity analysis;grade crossing;grace period;procurement method;traffic engineering;project's impact;counterpart fund;private operator;access improvements;road traffic;suburban train;urban population;grade separation;construction phase;prior review;compensation measures;accessibility improvement;rail lines;budget allocation;subsidy policy;urban dweller;subsidy scheme;Project Monitoring;working day;staff costs;social exclusion;investment study;objective criterion;health facility;environmental knowledge;social interaction;federal level;social aspect;railway line;budgetary resource;disbursement ratio;government's commitment;financing request;procurement documents;travel distance;unforeseen circumstance;ongoing work;economic recovery;traffic counting;traffic model;accessibility problem;passenger use;potential conflicts;fare integration;learning process;accident rate;regulatory commission;outcome targets;recent years;waiting time;historical data;commercial speed;rail road;land use;car accident;civil engineering;private transport;engineering design;transport model;traffic bottleneck;forecasting model;conservative assumption;pedestrian accident;rolling stock;transport demand;car driver;construction process;legal constraint;governance issue;staff recruitment;Population Growth;vehicular accidents;project financing;Labor Market;documentary evidence;external auditing;risk assessment;audit recommendation;related contract;loan proceeds;relative price;cost sharing;field work;private-public partnership;mass transit;support infrastructure;rail operation;domestic legislation;procurement rule;accident cost;social monitoring;public consultation;living standard;rail system;rail equipment;Economic Studies;economic study;railway station;street light;lessons learnt;increasing transparency;monetary term;federal government;facilitating trade;macroeconomic level;transport condition;environmental condition;road base;railway operation;strategic approach;monitoring indicator;traffic forecast;low-income people;lower-income population;infrastructure asset;social inclusion;investment program;project costing;project administration;rail station;environmental monitoring;institutional framework;transportation infrastructure;transfer station;transfer facility;road access;data processing;urbanized countries;city population;transport need;rail operator;transportation need;investment level;productivity gain;Population Density;poverty alleviation;human capital;household survey;metropolitan transport;social end;social ranking;residual value;environmental aspect;annual saving;train service;passenger time;professional capacity;accident type;economic appraisal;low-income neighborhood;induced impacts;natural habitat



Versão oficial do documento (pode conter assinaturas, etc.)

  • PDF oficial
  • TXT*
  • Total Downloads** :
  • Download Stats
  • *A versão do texto é um OCR incorreto e está incluído unicamente em benefício de usuários com conectividade lenta.